RPC Bulletin #81, October 2024

Each month, we email a bulletin to everyone who has signed up on this site. Below is the edition that we sent in October 2024. If you like it, please sign up on our Get Involved section – you will be showing your support for our work and you will receive our free monthly bulletins a month before they appear here.

IN THIS ISSUE… +++ Royal Parks’ new chair removed – before starting job +++ Youths on mopeds may not be as suspicious as you think +++ Cyclist tailed by police buggy +++ Get your bike marked on your way into work +++

Visit our sponsors: Bella Velo, Cycle Exchange, Kingston Wheelers, London Dynamo, Pearson Cycles, Richmond Cycles, Sigma Sports

THERE’S SOMETHING ABOUT DAME MARY…

All change at the top for The Royal Parks, with a dash of political intrigue, as Dame Mary Archer has been removed as chair of the organisation before she had even taken up the post.

The 79-year-old academic was given the job by the Conservative government in May, with the Daily Mail reporting at the time that the appointment was “rushed through 48 hours after the announcement of the General Election so it could not be vetoed by the Opposition”. Labour won on July 4, and Dame Mary’s four-year tenure, which was due to begin on July 24, was put on ice. Then, in mid-September, Lisa Nandy, the new Culture Secretary, officially announced that the Tory peer’s appointment had been cancelled – which an incoming government is able to do if the appointee has not yet started the job. Previous chair Loyd Grossman, who had been in post since 2016, will stay on until a permanent replacement is found. (Pointedly, the Department for Culture, Media and Sport noted that the former MasterChef judge could continue as he “has not declared any significant political activity”.)

Meanwhile, Darren Share, TRP’s Director of Parks, postponed our second meeting with him due to “unavoidable changes in availability”. We understand that several dates have been marked for rescheduling – and we look forward to finding out what effect, if any, the removal of Dame Mary from the top job might have on TRP’s review of its cycling policy, which is our chief topic of discussion with Darren.

FALSE ALARM

Two years after the last spate of robberies, have violent bike thieves riding mopeds and e-bikes returned to the park? Thankfully not. It is true that there have been sightings of young men wearing face coverings while scooting around the park, but believe it or not, some of their activities turn out to be perfectly innocent when the police stop them to investigate. Sgt Pete Sturgess from the park’s police unit tells us one group who he spoke to seemed surprised that their presence was causing such concern.

Nevertheless, patrols from the Met’s Roads And Transport division will be visiting the park on a regular basis to keep an eye out and reassure the public. Everyone is encouraged to engage with them, so please speak to any officers you may see.

BUGGY SMALLS

Stop that cyclist! Unusual scenes on the park’s middle road last month, as Sgt Pete set off in his small all-terrain vehicle, with siren blaring and lights flashing, to stop a rider who was going rather too fast.

While the sight of a police buggy in pursuit of a cyclist may seem comical, it was justifiable and practical given the circumstances. Sgt Pete had witnessed the man riding at a brisk pace in close proximity to pedestrians, some of them children, as well as Lime bike riders who, as often inexperienced riders, can sometimes veer unpredictably. In this context, the cyclist was a potential hazard to others, and took his park regulation warning from Sgt Pete without complaint. The park’s police boss gave the same warnings to two other cyclists – and also stopped a motorist who said he was unaware that he was not permitted to drive on the middle road, which proved to be an unconvincing claim when it emerged he lives very close to Ham Gate. 

Park reg warnings are a fair means of addressing inappropriate speeds, as those stopped will only face further action if they are caught breaking regulations again within the following 12 months. And remember that the middle road is called the Quietway for a reason: as advised by our Safer Riding Guide, you should “give way to children, walkers and learner cyclists who frequent this mostly car-free area which runs through the centre of the park between Ham Cross and Sheen Cross.” It’s common-sense advice, and most cyclists follow it – so make sure you do too, lest you get a buggy on your tail.

DOUBLE MARKS

Calling all commuters – want to get your bike on the national security register, but you’re never in the park on weekends when marking events usually take place? Then stop by Sheen Cross from 8am on Friday, October 4, where Met officers will gladly mark up your pride and joy – and, as usual, you won’t have to pay a penny.

For those of you who would prefer to swing by after a few laps, another team will be at Ham Cross the next day – Saturday, October 5 – from 10am until 12pm.

Remember: putting your bike on the National Cycle Database is a deterrent to thieves – and if it does get nicked, the chances of your bicycle being returned to you should the police recover it are greatly increased.

SEE YOU NEXT MONTH...

As ever, thank you for allowing us to pop into your inbox, and let us know what you think about anything related to cycling in Richmond Park – we reply personally to every email you send us. If you enjoyed this bulletin, please share it with your cycling friends – and if they like what they read, encourage them to sign up to our mailing list too. The more subscribers we have, the bigger our voice.

All the best,

Richmond Park Cyclists

RPC Bulletin #80, September 2024

Each month, we email a bulletin to everyone who has signed up on this site. Below is the edition that we sent in September 2024. If you like it, please sign up on our Get Involved section – you will be showing your support for our work and you will receive our free monthly bulletins a month before they appear here.

IN THIS ISSUE… +++ The reason why the London Duathlon was cancelled +++ Tell us about your group rides for newcomers +++ Speed humps removed near Kingston Gate… then replaced +++ Become a pilot rider for partially sighted cyclists +++ E-bike batteries fire hazard +++

Visit our sponsors: BellaVelo, Cycle Exchange, Kingston Wheelers, London Dynamo, Pearson Cycles, Richmond Cycles, Sigma Sports

RUN, BIKE, DONE

What scuppered the London Duathlon, which was due to take place in Richmond Park this month? As viewers of RPC’s TV debut on BBC London News on Sunday will have discovered, the cancellation of the popular annual event was directly due to the much-publicised pedestrian fatality two years ago – and ten miles away – in Regent’s Park, along with the more recent inquest into the elderly woman’s sad death.

The organisers of the run-bike-run event blamed “an increased focus on the security and logistics of cycling events in public spaces which creates significant operational challenges.” The Royal Parks, meanwhile, told BBC London that it “wanted to review cycling events in its parks following a minority of people cycling at excessive speeds”.

Both of these statements are couched in general terms. But TRP had previously issued an assurance that it had decided not to approve cycle sport events while it reviewed its cycling policy specifically as a result of the Regent’s fatality. It had already cancelled London Dynamo’s two time trials, which are each capped at 120 competitors; by its own logic, the world’s largest duathlon, with a maxiumum of 4,000 participants, had to suffer the same fate. 

You can see the full BBC London report here.

SHARE THE EVIDENCE

The cancellation of the Duathlon, which has been held annually for a number of years, is a great shame. London needs events like this, and environments such as Richmond Park, to inspire the next generation to cycle – an activity which is proven to reduce stress, improve physical health and ease traffic congestion.

Moreover, The Royal Parks has stated in its latest annual report that “there is no evidence to suggest that [our] parks are becoming unsafe”, attributing a rise in recorded incidents, including non-cycling accidents, to “improved reporting processes” (see p68). And as we have mentioned in this bulletin before, ONS statistics show that pedestrian deaths involving cyclists are incredibly rare, with only nine occurring nationally in five years.

Facts such as these will inform our ongoing dialogue with Darren Share, TRP’s Director of Parks, when RPC and Sean Epstein, our counterpart at Regent’s Park Cyclists, have our second meeting with him on Tuesday. All parties, including TRP, agree that an evidence-based approach is the way forward, and we aim to ensure that TRP’s future cycling policy fulfills the charity’s aim, stated on page six of its annual report, to “welcome everyone” – which should include those who cycle responsibly in sporting events.

ALL SYSTEMS ROE

The Royal Parks has now applied to Richmond Council for planning permission to build a new cafe at Roehampton Gate and redevelop the existing facilities in the vicinity. 

The council published the application on its website on Friday. The application document shows that spaces for cycle parking are intended to rise from 20 to 98. Construction is scheduled to take place from November next year until August 2026, and the estimated cost of the proposal is documented as “up to £2m”. A public consultation will now follow. 

As revealed in April’s RPC bulletin, we were consulted on the ideas for the redevelopment and made recommendations concerning cycling access, bike parking and road surfacing. We were pleased with the plans TRP’s representatives showed us at the time, and we look forward to examining them further as they develop.

GROUP EFFORT

A quick thank-you to all the clubs who have taken up our offer to publicise their group rides which take place in Richmond Park. We aim to compile a list of as many as possible for inclusion on our website, so if you have a ride which welcomes newcomers regardless of their skill level or experience, please get in touch so we can include you.

GETTING THE HUMP

Those of you who cycled into the park via Kingston Gate on Tuesday might have seen roadworks taking place on King’s Road. This was a consequence of what could be described as a concerned local, armed with a tape measure, discovering that the speed humps installed as part of the temporary one-way trial were slightly higher than the legal maximum and arguing that they could damage the undercarriage of cars (although they don’t appear to be a problem for the vast majority of motorists who pass over them at an appropriately sedate speed).

A letter from Kingston Council to residents, reproduced on the NextDoor forum, stated that its contractor had agreed at their own cost to bulldoze the humps and install new ones that are within the correct dimensions, which they apparently did on Tuesday. The three bumps on King’s Road were all of differing heights, the largest being 2.8cm higher than what the council set out as the standard maximum of 8cm. 

This episode illustrates that none of us should take the continuation of the one-way system in its present form for granted. Officially, it is only a temporary trial which could be amended or even scrapped by next year. So if, like us, you don’t want a return to the bad old days of encountering huge frustration, angry confrontations – including the occasional fist fight – and additional pollution on King’s Road as you cycle to and from the park, please take a few moments to fill in this petition, which was brought to our attention by the Friends of Kingston Gate.

The council’s Kingston and North Kingston Neighbourhood Committee is meeting on Thursday to decide if the traffic trial should “remain unchanged for the current time to allow further monitoring to be undertaken”, and there is an opportunity to submit petitions, which we assume is a chance for the organisers of the King’s Road petition to present theirs. You can read the agenda here, and have a look at the road data here, which seems to show there is little change to traffic levels overall compared to the period before the scheme began, and vehicles are now moving slower.

SEE THE DIFFERENCE

Our friends at Merton Sports and Social Club for Visually Impaired People tell us that they “reaped valuable benefits” and generally had a great response to an appeal for volunteers which appeared in the January edition of this bulletin.

The organisation, which is the only one of its kind in London, takes enthusiastic visually impaired local people on tandem rides, ranging from around Richmond Park to a 40-mile club run. They ride from the club’s base in Morden on the first Sunday and third Saturday of the month, although there is no minimum commitment for volunteers.

If you would like to be a tandem pilot, please email MSSC chair Terry Jones at tandemmanagement@mssc.org.uk so she can give you more details. Like some of your fellow RPC subscribers who are already involved, you are likely to find the rides exceptionally rewarding. 

BLAZING SADDLES

On a final note, a word on the safety of electric bikes from Richmond Fire Station, who got in touch with us last month. They say that self-combusting lithium batteries are the fastest-gowing risk in the capital, and fire officers attended one e-bike or e-scooter fire every two days on average last year. The majority of incidents occur within homes, and many are caused by incompatible chargers, bike modifications or faulty or counterfeit products purchased online.

Blazes of this kind can start in seconds. If you have an electric-powered bicycle, the brigade advises:

• Don’t charge your batteries by your front door or any escape route

• Never charge your batteries overnight

• Only buy your batteries from a reputable seller

You can find out more, including the warning signs that your e-bike or battery is a potential hazard, by looking at the fire brigade’s information guide.

SEE YOU NEXT MONTH...

As ever, thank you for allowing us to pop into your inbox, and let us know what you think about anything related to cycling in Richmond Park – we reply personally to every email you send us. If you enjoyed this bulletin, please share it with your cycling friends – and if they like what they read, encourage them to sign up to our mailing list too. The more subscribers we have, the bigger our voice.

All the best,

Richmond Park Cyclists

RPC Bulletin #79, August 2024

Each month, we email a bulletin to everyone who has signed up on this site. Below is the edition that we sent in August 2024. If you like it, please sign up on our Get Involved section – you will be showing your support for our work and you will receive our free monthly bulletins a month before they appear here.

IN THIS ISSUE… +++ Meeting with Royal Parks’ boss ahead of cycling review +++ Police to look at speeding motorists during the morning rush hour +++ Rundown of incidents police have been involved in over the past three months +++

Visit our sponsors: BellaVelo, Cycle Exchange, Kingston Wheelers, London Dynamo, Pearson Cycles, Richmond Cycles, Sigma Sports

PLENTY TO SHARE

A couple of weeks ago we met with Darren Share, The Royal Parks’ new Director of Parks, to begin discussions about TRP’s review of its cycling policies following the inquest in May into the pedestrian fatality in Regent’s Park. Also attending the meeting at TRP’s HQ in Hyde Park were Regent’s Park Cyclists’ chair Sean Epstein, Tim Lennon of the London Cycling Campaign, along with representatives from Richmond and Regent’s parks' policing teams. 

TRP’s board of trustees has asked Darren to carry out the review. Consulting the full spectrum of stakeholders, including Richmond Park Cyclists, will be key to balancing the needs of all types of visitors to the royal parks, and we have asked for the review to be data-driven. TRP and the police appear to support this objective approach.

It was a pleasure to meet Darren, and we look forward to seeing him again in early September. In preparation, we have undertaken some work and will be reaching out to cycling, active travel and disabled groups for specialist expertise. Some of you have writen to us in the past expressing concerns over pedestrian and cycle safety in Richmond Park; if you’ve been holding back, do email us now if you’d like to give your view so we can feed it into our discussions with Darren.

You tell us you feel safer when you are walking and cycling in Richmond Park compared to typical roads. Let’s see if the data confirms that.

COMMUTER ERRORS

Long-time subscribers to our bulletins will know that the park’s police set their priorities every three months at the Safer Parks Police Panel, and as attendees we can advise what areas we believe they should focus on. 

At the SPPP meeting last month, we suggested that motorists who speed and close pass cyclists during the morning rush hour was an aspect of road behaviour they could concentrate on, and Sgt Peter Sturgess has agreed to make it one of his team’s sub-priorities this quarter. While policing of the park between 7am and 8am is limited due to staffing issues, we are very grateful to Sgt Sturgess and his team for looking at this matter and for generally helping to make the park roads safer.

The full list of priorities, agreed by the panel, is as follows:

1. Pedestrian safety (courtesy crossings, middle road and gravel bikes on the Tamsin Trail)

2. Cycling safety (Beverly Brook Bridge, obedience and motorist behaviour)

3. Wildlife protection (deer protection, dogs around skylark fields)

REPORT RUNDOWN

As is standard practice at the Safer Parks Police Panel, Sgt Sturgess provided a list of incidents on the roadway and the Tamsin Trail that his team dealt with during the past three months, highlights of which we summarise below.

• A car passenger committed a public order offence in May when they racially abused a cyclist and kicked their bike. The incident began when a motorist pulled out in front of the rider at Kingston Gate car park. The cyclist shouted at the driver, who proceeded to follow them. The two stopped and argued, and the cyclist took photos of the motorist as well as the car’s other occupants. A man got out of the vehicle, kicking the cyclist’s bike and racially abusing them.

• In April, a driver swerved towards a cyclist, sounding their horn before close passing them. Both stopped at Pembroke Lodge. The driver got a hammer out of their vehicle, and threatened and verbally abused the victim – a public order offence.

• In May a driver sounded their horn at a cyclist who was cycling in the middle of the lane and overtook them. The driver parked their car and got out, and the cyclist came from behind and punched them – an incident of common assault by the cyclist. 

• A cyclist was reported to have spat towards a moving vehicle in May.

• Also in May, a person walking a dog who was wearing headphones was startled and jumped as a cyclist passed on the Tamsin Trail. The cyclist asked whether it was a good idea to wear headphones on the shared use path, and the dog walker pushed them, committing an act of common assault.

• On separate dates in May, three bikes were stolen from Roehampton Gate Car Park, two of which we understand were from the cycle hire shop.

• There were two falls in June. At Kingston Gate, there was an altercation between a cyclist and a motorist after a close pass. The cyclist undertook the driver to “have words” but lost balance, resulting in cuts and bruising. Later in the month, a cyclist steered around a runner on Sawyer’s Hill but lost their balance and dislocated their shoulder in a fall.

• In April, two cyclists riding together at Sheen Cross came into contact and fell, with one sustaining a broken collar bone.

Traffic offences and relevant breaches of park regulations were as follows:

Trade vehicles – 192

Unauthorised parking/unattended – 143

Driving not on a road – 45

Speed – 28

Off track cycling – 20

Contravening signs (including closed roads) – 6

Driving a vehicle to endanger any person – 5

Driving without due care – 3

Using a mobile while driving – 3

No valid license – 2

No insurance – 1

No cycle lights after dark – 1

BAD REACTIONS

Finally, a note on rider behaviour on the park’s roads, which appear to have been busier than usual recently. Subscribers have told us they have seen a small minority riding inconsiderately through and around traffic, startling other cyclists, pedestrians and motorists. If you see any person on a bike who is behaving badly, politely advise them to adjust their conduct in future – and remember that the way you ride can affect how cyclists in the park are generally perceived. 

SEE YOU NEXT MONTH...

As ever, thank you for allowing us to pop into your inbox, and let us know what you think about anything related to cycling in Richmond Park – we reply personally to every email you send us. If you enjoyed this bulletin, please share it with your cycling friends – and if they like what they read, encourage them to sign up to our mailing list too. The more subscribers we have, the bigger our voice.

All the best,

Richmond Park Cyclists

RPC Bulletin #78, July 2024

Each month, we email a bulletin to everyone who has signed up on this site. Below is the edition that we sent in July 2024. If you like it, please sign up on our Get Involved section – you will be showing your support for our work and you will receive our free monthly bulletins a month before they appear here.

IN THIS ISSUE… +++ Safer Riding Guide temporarily removed from park – but cards are out soon +++ Why were time trials cancelled while the duathlon can still go ahead? +++ Gangs on e-bikes snatching bags +++ Bike marking event at Pen Ponds +++ 

Visit our sponsors: Bella Velo, Cycle Exchange, Kingston Wheelers, London Dynamo, Look Mum No Hands!, Pearson Cycles, Richmond Cycles, Evolve e-Bikes

BOARD GAMES

Now you see it… now you don’t. Strange times last week when we finally got round to pinning the Safer Riding Guide on our noticeboard outside Colicci, only for park manager Paul Richards to ask us to take it down shortly afterwards – which, out of respect to his authority, we agreed to do. 

Formerly known as the Code of Conduct, our guide is a list of simple tips for safe, considerate riding – but it seems that The Royal Parks has lately misunderstood a small part of the wording on cycling speeds. Sgt Pete Sturgess from the park’s police has since suggested an alternative, and we are confident that we can decide on phrasing that will please all parties when we sit down with him and Paul this week at our regular quarterly meeting.

But it should be noted that the SRG appeared on our website in October, which was some months after we presented the final version to Paul Richards. And following the recent inquest into the pedestrian fatality involving a cyclist in Regent’s Park, we now believe that TRP is likely to carry out a review of its cycling policies across its estate, especially as it is about to welcome Dame Mary Archer as the new chair for its board of trustees. 

Representatives from Richmond Park Cyclists and Regent’s Park Cyclists will meet with Darren Share, TRP’s new Director of Parks, in a few weeks’ time to find out more and discuss how we can work more closely with TRP to help maintain a safe, welcoming environment for all park visitors. We welcome any review – as long as it fully involves cycling advocacy groups who can be more effective advocates of behavioural change

This bulletin explains some of the issues we are likely to explore. 

LIMIT POINT

The park manager’s concern with the Safer Riding Guide was its advice on the speed limit. The SRG, which was put together with the help of the park’s police and our subscribers, states:

Speed limits in the park do not apply to cyclists – but that does not mean you can ride as fast as you like all the time. The police enforce a regulation stipulating that you must not ride in a manner that would endanger the safety of other park visitors or yourself. So slow down for pedestrians, anticipate road furniture and other potential hazards, and always be aware that deer can run out at any time. Sensible speeds create a more welcoming environment for everyone.

The Royal Parks’ policy on cycling reads:

We do ask that cyclists observe the motor vehicle speed limit for the park, the road or path in question. This varies from 5mph to 20mph. This helps to maintain a safe environment for visitors of all ages, and protects road users, as well as wildlife – particularly as wild deer in Bushy or Richmond Parks may behave unpredictably and run across park roads.

Essentially, both TRP and RPC are encouraging people, in differing ways, to ride sensibly while remaining aware of any potential hazards around them. But Paul Richards tells us that we “endorse that cyclists can speed in the park as long as it’s not all the time,“ which is incorrect. The SRG clearly tells cyclists to adjust their speed, show consideration to all park visitors and abide by the park regulations, while correctly indicating that actual speed limits in the park only apply to drivers – just as they do on all UK roads.

Thankfully, the wording on the condensed, credit card-sized version of the SRG won’t have to be altered as it doesn’t make explicit reference to the speed limit for motor vehicles:

NOT SO FAST: Slow down for pedestrians, anticipate road furniture and other potential hazards, and always be aware that deer can run out at any time.

The SRG cards have been printed, so expect to see them available for free in some of our sponsors’ businesses soon. Please get in touch if you would like a few for your cycling club or to hand out to other cyclists you may know.

REGULATION ISSUE

Would The Royal Parks, following pressure from some quarters triggered by the inquest into the fatality in Regent’s Park, be able to introduce enforceable speed limits for cyclists across its estate? It is possible, but extremely challenging.

Firstly, TRP and the park’s police originally agreed that the parts of the park regulations covering speed limits did apply to cyclists, before deciding with some finality in 2021 that they did not. Changing their mind again would seem capricious and embarrassing. Altering the regulations is another option but could take years or not happen at all as it requires a vote in parliament.

It is more likely that TRP could approach the police to take a more stringent line on cycling speed. Our experience is that the police will only wish to use the existing regulations. The police, who have limited time and resources, are best placed to judge which cases are prosecuted, especially as cyclists are proven to pose a very small risk to the public. We will find out more at our two forthcoming meetings with Sgt Sturgess and the Head of Parks.

TRIALS HALTED

One final note on speed. A couple of weeks after our last monthly bulletin arrived in your inbox, The Royal Parks axed the summer time trials, stating that they “required a pause to evaluate our position” on cycling speeds following the inquest into the Regent’s fatality.

London Dynamo, which has been running the Richmond Park TTs for 15 years, does a risk assessment in conjunction with the sporting body Cycling Time Trials for the two popular, inclusive, fully insured events, and there have never been any safety-related incidents to our knowledge. Richmond Park is one of CTT’s safest and most heavily marshalled courses – but despite a month of talks with TRP, we were unable to reverse the decision.

And yet the London Duathlon, half of which is a cycling time trial, is going ahead in September. Obviously, we are pleased for the competitors that the event (which is much bigger than the RPTTs) has not been cancelled. But why “pause” one and not the other? We hope to have an answer after our two meetings with TRP’s management this month.

SNATCH AND GRAB

There have been recent messages on various WhatsApp groups warning that gangs on mopeds have returned to the park to steal bikes again – which, thankfully, is not quite true. There have been no new bike-jackings, but The Royal Parks has told its team of volunteer rangers that youths on e-bikes wearing black hoodies and face coverings have been snatching bags. If you see anything suspicious, please call 101 – or if you witness an incident or there is an emergency, dial 999. Do not approach anyone acting suspiciously and stay safe.

ON YOUR MARKS…

It’s bike marking time again, friends! Bring your pride and joy to Pen Ponds on Saturday, July 13 to get it on the national register – and as usual, you won’t have to pay a penny. Remember: registering your bike is a deterrent to thieves – and if it is nicked, you stand a much better chance of getting it back. Our thanks once again to Sgt Sturgess and Met officers for carrying out this useful service.

SEE YOU NEXT MONTH...

As ever, thank you for allowing us to pop into your inbox, and let us know what you think about anything related to cycling in Richmond Park – we reply personally to every email you send us. If you enjoyed this bulletin, please share it with your cycling friends – and if they like what they read, encourage them to sign up to our mailing list too. The more subscribers we have, the bigger our voice.

All the best,

Richmond Park Cyclists

RPC Bulletin #77, June 2024

Each month, we email a bulletin to everyone who has signed up on this site. Below is the edition that we sent in June 2024. If you like it, please sign up on our Get Involved section – you will be showing your support for our work and you will receive our free monthly bulletins a month before they appear here.

IN THIS ISSUE… +++ Nationwide reaction to fatality in Regent’s Park +++ What was the key issue in the death of 81-year-old pedestrian? +++ Why ride-logging apps aren’t the bad guys +++

Visit our sponsors: Bella Velo, Cycle Exchange, Kingston Wheelers, London Dynamo, Look Mum No Hands!, Pearson Cycles, Richmond Cycles, Evolve e-Bikes

HAZARDOUS THOUGHTS

The recent inquest into the death of an elderly woman after she stepped into the path of a cyclist in Regent’s Park has placed cycling speeds under national scrutiny, prompting an attempt by a Conservative MP to make cyclists face the same penalties as drivers who cause death or serious injury. With the incident attracting much negative media attention, The Royal Parks has felt pressure to review its largely supportive policies on active travel and cycling across its estate, including Richmond Park. 

TRP has already asked Strava, along with other ride-logging apps, to remove Regent’s Park Outer Circle as a segment (a route where cyclists’ times are ranked), while the perimeter road in Richmond Park has been flagged as “hazardous” – which, compared to roads outside the park, it is not. The inference is clear: when it comes to keeping pedestrians in Royal Parks safe, TRP wants to tackle what it considers to be the inappropriate speed of cyclists. 

But the exceptionally low accident rate involving pedestrians indicates that the overwhelming majority of cyclists in Royal Parks ride safely. Our concern is that restrictions may be ill-considered which would impact the enjoyment of riding in Richmond Park – pushing visitors to ride on less safe roads outside. We urge TRP to take a circumspect view by consulting with us and Regent’s Park Cyclists for our views and experiences on the most effective means of improving cyclist and pedestrian safety and enjoyment. In this bulletin, we set out why.

QUICK TO JUDGE

It is fair to say that, following the wide coverage of 81-year-old Hilda Griffiths’ very unfortunate death, many ordinary members of the public have become aware for the first time that there is no speed limit for cycling on British roads. And many may have assumed that cyclists can therefore ride as fast as they like, whenever they like, with impunity, which is not the case. There are already laws against dangerous and inconsiderate cycling, including inappropriately high speeds, which the police use if a cyclist is considered to have put pedestrians or themselves at risk. 

A concomitant conclusion by many incensed readers of national newspapers would have been that if investment banker Brian Fitzgerald cycled at the speed limit for motorists when he was out with his clubmates at 7am on a Saturday morning in summer 2022, he may not have struck the victim. But on the basis of the facts presented at the inquest, this seems unlikely.

Fitzgerald said he was only two metres away when he saw the woman – giving him less than a quarter of a second to try to avoid her, even if he had been traveling at 20mph (although if he had been moving slower, it could be argued he would have hit her with less impact). It would appear assistant coroner Jean Harkin’s verdict of “accidental cycling collision death” bears out this considered opinion and is, we believe, a fair one. She also rejected calls for a report into the prevention of future deaths caused by cyclists in Regent’s Park because “there has never [previously] been a death of a pedestrian as a result in these circumstances”. And nationally, the risk of a fatality in such situations is incredibly small: only 2.5 of the UK’s 400 annual pedestrian deaths involve a bicycle – the rest are all down to motor vehicles.

COMMUNICATION IS KEY

Rather than focus intently on the issue of speed, The Royal Parks should take up the offer from Richmond Park Cyclists and our friends at Regent’s Park Cyclists to engage in dialogue and to look at other aspects of road safety which contribute to collisions. Do riders in groups communicate as effectively as they can to each other when they see a pedestrian? Could there be improvements to signage, alerting cyclists and pedestrians to each other’s presence? Can visibility be improved by restricting parked cars in Regent’s Park, or encouraging cyclists to take the central position, thereby moving them further away from the kerb?  

All of these are thoughts and suggestions, not recommendations. We already have our Safer Riding Guide, which covers the most straightforward means for cyclists to aid road safety in Richmond Park, and it was put together with the help of the Royal Parks’ police unit. The latest version will soon appear on our noticeboard outside Colicci, and we will encourage TRP to promote it.

WE’RE STRAVA KEEN

Another aspect of cycling that the wider public may not have been aware of until they read about the Regent’s fatality is the use of Strava. With its segments and leaderboards seemingly encouraging fast speeds, the most popular ride-logging app probably looks like the bad guy. But lap times were recorded on cycling forums long before Strava arrived in 2009, and they could now migrate to closed WhatsApp groups – making the tiny minority of cyclists who do travel at problematically fast speeds harder for the authorities to see. And there is another aspect of Strava which would be useful for The Royal Parks to harness.

Strava Metro is an aggregated, anonymised, deep-dive information source which is only available to “groups directly involved in active transportation and infrastructure planning” – organisations, in other words, like TRP. Two years ago we put together a presentation which aimed to show TRP how the data available could measure how safe Richmond Park is for cycling and walking, as well as improve aspects of safety. Sadly, the process of getting the presentation to TRP’s board stalled – but recent events make this an opportune moment to restart that process.

SEE YOU NEXT MONTH...

As ever, thank you for allowing us to pop into your inbox, and let us know what you think about anything related to cycling in Richmond Park – we reply personally to every email you send us. If you enjoyed this bulletin, please share it with your cycling friends – and if they like what they read, encourage them to sign up to our mailing list too. The more subscribers we have, the bigger our voice.

All the best,

Richmond Park Cyclists

RPC Bulletin #76, May 2024

Each month, we email a bulletin to everyone who has signed up on this site. Below is the edition that we sent in May 2024. If you like it, please sign up on our Get Involved section – you will be showing your support for our work and you will receive our free monthly bulletins a month before they appear here.

IN THIS ISSUE… +++ Rundown of road offences and other incidents the police attended over the past three months  +++ Collecting data to discover how safe the roadway is +++ Help maintain the natural environment of the park – and meet us! +++ Take care around dog owners +++

Visit our sponsors: Bella Velo, Cycle Exchange, Kingston Wheelers, London Dynamo, Look Mum No Hands!, Pearson Cycles, Richmond Cycles, Evolve e-Bikes

MEETINGS POINTS

It’s been a busy few weeks for us at Richmond Park Cyclists. This coming Tuesday we will be representing your interests at the stakeholders’ breakfast, a biannual event hosted by some of the people who run The Royal Parks, and we are due to have our regular quarterly meeting with Sergeant Pete Sturgess, who is in charge of policing the outer Royal Parks, and park manager Paul Richards. 

We also sat with Paul on the Safer Parks Police panel two weeks ago where, as usual, the list of all incidents that officers attended over the past three months were presented to the stakeholders present. We are grateful to Sgt Sturgess and his team for collating the information and helping to keep the roadway safer for cycling. This quarter’s figures showed, once again, that while cycling accidents outnumber motor vehicle and pedestrian accidents, they are largely self-inflicted, and motor vehicle offences far outnumber everything else.

Before we share the data, we now have traffic counts from Paul detailing flows recorded last year over several days. We are extrapolating the number of cycling miles travelled with reported cycling accidents and will then seek comparable data for roads outside. Our aim is to demonstrate that the park’s roads are far safer for cycling than those cyclists might otherwise ride outside. Richmond Park certainly feels safer, but we would like to prove that it is the safest cycling destination in London and beyond.

Here are the incidents that occurred on the park’s roadway from January to March, as set out in the police’s report: 

• In January (as reported in a previous edition of this bulletin) a cyclist was left shocked and bruised after a motorist exceeding the 20mph speed limit close passed her on the Priory Lane stretch of the park’s road, snagging the woman’s jacket and dragging her for about 50 metres. 

• Near Ham Gate in February, there was an attempted theft of bikes from two cyclists by two assailants, who chased them by bike. A few days earlier, as reported in our March bulletin, a cyclist clipped the kerb and wands at Beverley Brook Bridge causing her to fall and break her hip and pelvis.

• A cyclist hit two stationary riders on Sawyers Hill in March, causing their bike to snap in half. The rider cracked their teeth and injured their shoulder.  Later in the month, a cyclist slipped on gravel at the roundabout on Priory Lane and grazed their hip.

• As for offences this quarter, one motorist was reported for dangerously carrying too many passengers and a cyclist was reported for riding without due care and attention. A total of 19 motorists were reported under Park Regulations for driving a vehicle in a manner that could endanger any person. A total of 50 motorists were reported for speeding, and 251 trade vehicle drivers were reported. One motorist was found to not have a valid license, and four held no insurance. There were also 141 tickets issued for unauthorised parking or leaving a vehicle unattended and 17 for contravening signs, including no entry, on the roads closed to traffic.

• There were eight cyclists reported for riding off-track and 36 motorists for driving “not on a road”.

The police priorities for the next quarter, as agreed by the panel, include pedestrian safety, especially on the courtesy crossings, the shared-use middle road and on the Tamsin Trail. Please slow down and stop to give way if it is safe to do so. Another priority is focussing on cycling safety, especially around the priority flow system on the Beverley Brook Bridge, which applies to cyclists as well as motorists. 

Separate to the panel meeting, RPC’s proposal to introduce a slip lane on Beverley Brook Bridge for cyclists travelling towards Roehampton has been rejected by TRP but we intend to employ a traffic engineer to design a solution showing how this could be safely and considerately introduced. 

ROOT CAUSES

There’s more to the park than the roadway and the Tamsin Trail. Here’s your chance to experience parts of the park that cycling may never have taken you and help to care for the natural environment in the process. You will also get to meet us in person!

The Royal Parks is looking for volunteers to assist with just two hours work in some of the meadow areas. One of the jobs at this time of year is the removal of ragwort – the small, yellow weed-like flowers which can kill grassland species and, in their dried form, are poisonous to horses.

The volunteer morning will take place on Sunday, May 19, from 9am until 11.30am, meeting at either Sheen Gate or at Colicci by Roehampton Gate (meeting point to be confirmed). If you can find the time to spare and would like to take part in this worthwhile activity, please email Fiona Megarrell, TRP’s volunteer officer, at fmegarrell@royalparks.org.uk and copy us in.

MUTTS DO BETTER

On a final note, a brief word about looking out for our four-legged friends and their owners. We’ve had reports that cyclists have been behaving inconsiderately towards dog walkers on the crossing in front of the car park near Robin Hood Gate car park. Please reduce your speed on your approach, particularly from the Broomfield Hill direction to give you more time to react to the greater number of people and animals who may be moving around, and refrain from shouting at them.

SEE YOU NEXT MONTH...

As ever, thank you for allowing us to pop into your inbox, and let us know what you think about anything related to cycling in Richmond Park – we reply personally to every email you send us. If you enjoyed this bulletin, please share it with your cycling friends – and if they like what they read, encourage them to sign up to our mailing list too. The more subscribers we have, the bigger our voice.

All the best,

Richmond Park Cyclists

RPC Bulletin #75, April 2024

Each month, we email a bulletin to everyone who has signed up on this site. Below is the edition that we sent in April 2024. If you like it, please sign up on our Get Involved section – you will be showing your support for our work and you will receive our free monthly bulletins a month before they appear here.

IN THIS ISSUE… +++ Revamp of Roehampton Gate cafe +++ Entries for time trials open +++ Car-free day rejected +++ Rules for dog-owners, and what to do if they don’t follow them +++ British Cycling event to encourage women to ride +++

Visit our sponsors: Bella Velo, Cycle Exchange, Kingston Wheelers, London Dynamo, Look Mum No Hands!, Pearson Cycles, Richmond Cycles, Evolve e-Bikes

LATTE DEVELOPERS

Coffee-lovers rejoice! After a very long wait, The Royal Parks has announced that Colicci will finally be redeveloped alongside the area surrounding the cafe, which will greatly improve the facility for cyclists.

In January, we were privileged to meet Jane Pelly, Head of Landscape at TRP, and Principal Landscape Architect Madeleine Murphy in the park, where we made recommendations concerning cycling access, bike parking and road surfacing. The plans they showed us will now be available for you to see at three open days on Thursday, April 4 (1-4pm), Saturday, April 6 (10am-1pm) or Friday, April 12 (11am-2pm) at the Roehampton Gate cafe, where you can ask questions and provide feedback. 

The present cafe building, which was originally located in St James’s Park, was transplanted to Richmond Park after the original pavilion burned down in 2004, and was only meant to last a few months until a permanent replacement was built. In December 2019, TRP’s ten-year management plan for the park stated it was still unable to find “a funding source” for the project, so these improvements are long overdue and most welcome. But with the hoops of planning permission still to jump through, there is a wait to come before the grand opening takes place in late 2026. In the meantime, you can read more about the redevelopment and see an artists’ impression of it on TRP’s website here.

FUN TIME

Entries for the park’s annual time trials, organised by London Dynamo, open TODAY. The 10.4-mile events, which take place on Sunday, June 23 and Sunday, July 7, are perfect for anyone who has never raced before, particularly as you get to experience the roads with barely any traffic on them. All you need is a basic road bike and an alarm clock to get you up in time for the starting slots, which are scheduled at 30-second intervals between 6am and 7am. 

The categories are Men’s Road, Men’s TT, Junior Male, Women’s Road, Women’s TT, Junior Female, Para and – for the second event only  – Men’s 3-Up TT and Women’s 3-Up TT.

Sign up for the first event here and the second here. Entries cost £16 for adults and £8 for juniors. Places go quickly, so don’t hang about!

CAR-FREE DAY REJECTED

If you were cycling in the park over the long weekend, you may have seen the usual tabard-wearing attendants helping to deal with the now-traditional increased flow of cars around the car parks which occurs during almost every public holiday. Their presence was of particular interest to us this time, due to the response from park manager Paul Richards regarding one of our familiar projects.

Paul told us that The Royal Parks will not take up our proposal to prevent motor vehicles travelling through the park during World Car-Free Day on Sunday, September 22. He assured us that TRP had explored the idea “in detail”, but “due to operational reasons, including the need to provide operational access between Richmond and Kingston Gates, and to Pembroke Lodge, we do not have the resources to implement a restriction of access to all motor traffic on that day.” Obviously, this is a disappointing outcome, but particularly so when it is clear that TRP clearly has the money to spend on contractors to man the car parks every Bank Holiday weekend – and a car-free day could tempt some of those drivers queuing up on the park roads to visit by bike next time.

Paul also declined to explain why our plan for widening the controversial one-way lane to accommodate a cycle slip-lane on Beverley Brook Bridge and narrowing the pedestrian section wasn’t viable. He stated that our second option of a footbridge, “is on the future projects list but with no timeline”. Once again, he made no reference to the woman who came off her bike and broke her femur after misjudging the barrier on the bridge in February, nor the experienced cyclist whose bike was damaged in October when a motorist in front of him braked suddenly.

We’re treating these knockbacks on Car Free Day and Beverley Brook Bridge as a stalemate for the time being, and will press forward with our investigations into both while we consider how to respond.

PAW SHOW

A subscriber contacted us after a dog owner allowed their pet to run out of control across the road and did not seem to accept when challenged that they had an obligation to control the animal in the park. We thought we would share the correct information, should you find yourself in a similar situation or knocked off your bike by an errant hound.

All dogs should be on leads at all times during deer birthing season, which is from May 1 to July 31. And while the section of the Road Traffic Act which requires dogs to be on leads when crossing the road does not apply in the park, any failure to control a dog could be an offence under three sections of the park’s regulations which the police actively enforce. One – Section 3(5) – would apply if an officer asks the person with the animal to place it on a lead; the other two state that a visitor to the park should not “intentionally or recklessly interfere with the safety, comfort or convenience of any person” (Section 3 (1)) or “cause or permit any animal or bird of which he is in charge to chase, worry, or injure any other animal or bird” (Section 4 (21)). 

If a dog causes you to crash, make sure you ask for details of the owner and any witnesses, as both could be vital in court or in an insurance claim. Call 101 to report the incident, or 999 if the injury is serious. Similarly, dial 101 if you see a loose dog that appears to endanger cyclists.

BREEZY DOES IT

A brief word on two events you may want to participate in.

• The park management has invited British Cycling to run a ride for Breeze, the national body’s programme to get more women into riding bikes for fun. The inclusive, women-only event will take place in the park in May. We’ll let you know the exact date as soon as it’s announced.

• On Wednesday, our friends at the London Cycling Campaign are launching London Loves Cycling, their initiative targeted at the candidates running for London Mayor. The aim is to avoid the distraction of culture wars currently raging around cycling by celebrating the bike as a hugely popular mode of transport in the capital. LCC says there will be plenty of opportunities for you to spread the message, so keep an eye on the new campaign website.

SEE YOU NEXT MONTH...

As ever, thank you for allowing us to pop into your inbox, and let us know what you think about anything related to cycling in Richmond Park – we reply personally to every email you send us. If you enjoyed this bulletin, please share it with your cycling friends – and if they like what they read, encourage them to sign up to our mailing list too. The more subscribers we have, the bigger our voice.

All the best,

Richmond Park Cyclists

RPC Bulletin #74, March 2024

Each month, we email a bulletin to everyone who has signed up on this site. Below is the edition that we sent in March 2024. If you like it, please sign up on our Get Involved section – you will be showing your support for our work and you will receive our free monthly bulletins a month before they appear here.

IN THIS ISSUE… +++ Respond to park survey TODAY +++ Woman injured on Beverley Brook Bridge +++ Road rage verdict – five years later +++ Kingstonians! Tell council what you think about one-way trial next to park +++ Join LCC ride to make cycling more accessible +++ Help us update our noticeboard +++ Warning if you are taking a detour during deer cull +++ 

Visit our sponsors: Bella Velo, Cycle Exchange, Kingston Wheelers, London Dynamo, Look Mum No Hands!, Pearson Cycles, Richmond Cycles, Evolve e-Bikes

TIME’S RUNNING OUT

The Royal Parks’ annual survey closes tomorrow at 5pm. This is your chance to tell the people who run Richmond Park what you like and dislike about it – and the questions only take a few moments to answer.

The link to register is here. Once you’ve filled in your details, you will be signed up to the Royal Parks Panel and receive an email directing you to the survey. If you have already signed up to TRP’s research emails, check your inbox and junk folder.

Question ten in the survey asks: “Are there any improvements you would like to see?” If you feel strongly about the road-narrowing installations at Beverley Brook Bridge and the timber gates, or the presence of through traffic, or any other issue, this is your opportunity to express your views, politely and articulately.

The responses are likely to have some effect on TRP’s future plans for the park. We suspect that its previous annual surveys have not had enough feedback from cyclists, so please sign up and help correct the imbalance. 

CRASH BARRIER

At around 9am on Sunday, February 4, a woman was seriously injured while cycling in the single lane on Beverley Brook Bridge.

The cyclist, who we are told is an experienced triathlete, landed on her hip after misjudging the plastic barrier. She was taken to Kingston Hospital, where she was fitted with a steel plate and pins in her femur. No other party was involved and the police attended the scene. We wish the cyclist a speedy recovery.

We wrote to park manager Paul Richards after the crash. Responding later to correspondence we had sent prior to the incident, which outlined our existing objections to the installations on the bridge, he reiterated that a safety audit “confirmed that the plans for new safety measures were safely designed, and that the measures have been safely installed, and they allow the safe movement of cyclists”. He made no reference to the woman’s crash.

Ever since the installations arrived, we have maintained that they leave very little margin for error if a cyclist misjudges them, and as such they are a hazard. We will continue to press the park’s management for the data which, they claim, shows the installations are safe.

ROAD RAGE: VERDICT IS IN

There has been a frustrating outcome to the road rage case outlined in last month’s bulletin. As we reported, the incident involving a cyclist and a motorist on Queen’s Road took place almost five years ago, and Sgt Sturgess from the park’s police unit helped to speed up the scheduling of the long-awaited court hearing (although the date we gave for the trial was incorrect: it actually took place this month, not May as we reported).

The hearing at Kingston Crown Court, which lasted five days, ended with the defendant acquitted of dangerous driving and assault occasioning actual bodily harm. 

Contradictory evidence concerning the identification of the driver was one of the factors that led the jury to conclude guilt could not be proved beyond reasonable doubt.

The verdict must be disappointing for the victim. While road rage incidents in the park are relatively rare, this case once again shows how it can often take years for them to reach the courts – and, of course, removing through traffic would likely reduce the number of driver-related conflicts.

ONE WAY… OR ANOTHER?

How are you finding the one-way system currently being trialled around the Kingston Gate entrance to the park? Our initial impression is that King’s Road is now far less intimidating to cycle through – and if you live in the area, there is an online questionnaire for you to tell the council what you think. 

The link is here, and it only takes five minutes to complete. The trial is scheduled to last up to 18 months, and the responses will form part of the decision to make it permanent or not.

LADIES’ DAY

Our friends at the Kingston Cycling Campaign are inviting “women and allies” to join a group ride this Sunday which will take you to the start of the Women’s Freedom Ride in central London.

The event is calling on the Mayor of London to ensure cycling is an inclusive mode of transport after research by the London Cycling Campaign revealed that less than a third of trips made by bike in the capital are taken by women. Its report also revealed the alarming levels of abuse and intimidation directed at women when they cycle.

KCC is running two marshalled rides, suitable for cyclists of all abilities and regardless of gender, to the start of the LCC event, leaving from Kingston Market Place at 9.50am and New Malden Station at 10.15am. Both are approximately 17 miles and will use quiet roads. You can register for either of them here. Signing up for the feeder ride automatically includes your registration for the five-mile Freedom Ride, which leaves from Lincoln’s Inn Fields at 12.30pm.

TAKE NOTICE

Our noticeboard outside Colicci is getting a spruce-up – and we’re inviting you to provide up-to-date information to display on it. 

If you run a club or an organisation that rides in or around Richmond Park, please provide us with its name and a link for more information so that anyone who would like to ride with you can find out more. We’re particularly keen to appeal to general leisure riders or those who want to try riding in a group for the first time. The info will also go on our website. In the meantime, our updated Safer Riding Guide will appear on the noticeboard soon.

DON’T GET INTO THE GROOVE

Finally, a word of warning if you are cycling on the A3 in the evening as an alternative to the park while the deer cull is taking place. 

One of us at RPC was riding on the shared use pavement outside the Asda at Roehampton Vale late one night when our front wheel got into a narrow groove which was roughly the width of a road bike tyre. This affected the steering, and by trying to move right we were thrown off the bike, across the crash barrier and into the road. Thankfully, a few superficial cuts were the only injuries – but it could have been worse if a car had come along. 

We’ve reported the incident, and you can see the offending pavement and footage of the fall on our Instagram. The groove is easy to miss in the darkness, so please take care.

SEE YOU NEXT MONTH...

As ever, thank you for allowing us to pop into your inbox, and let us know what you think about anything related to cycling in Richmond Park – we reply personally to every email you send us. If you enjoyed this bulletin, please share it with your cycling friends – and if they like what they read, encourage them to sign up to our mailing list too. The more subscribers we have, the bigger our voice.

All the best,

Richmond Park Cyclists

RPC Bulletin #73, February 2024

Each month, we email a bulletin to everyone who has signed up on this site. Below is the edition that we sent in February 2024. If you like it, please sign up on our Get Involved section – you will be showing your support for our work and you will receive our free monthly bulletins a month before they appear here.

IN THIS ISSUE… +++ Park closed tonight as deer cull starts +++ One-way system on King’s Road finally begins +++ Cyclist dragged by motorist after close pass fails +++ Five-year delay for justice +++ Rundown of incidents in the park over the past three months

Visit our sponsors: Bella Velo, Cycle Exchange, Kingston Wheelers, London Dynamo, Look Mum No Hands!, Pearson Cycles, Richmond Cycles, Evolve e-Bikes

FIRST THINGS FIRST

It’s February 1 – which means the park will be completely closed from 8pm tonight as the biannual deer cull begins. The usual rules apply: if you arrive at any of the gates shortly before locking time, you should not enter unless you are absolutely certain you can easily reach your exit before 8pm – or you may end up waiting a long time for The Royal Parks’ team to arrive in their truck and let you out.

For public safety, the gates will be shut daily between 8pm and 7.30am for approximately seven weeks. If we learn that the cull has ended early, we will post updates on our social media. Links to our social media channels are at the foot of this email, and full details of the cull are on our website.

ONE WAY OR ANOTHER

If you entered or left the park via Kingston Gate in the past few days, you may have noticed a few changes in the form of planters and no-entry signs. A trial of a one-way system for motor traffic on King’s Road began this week in an attempt to manage the exceptionally high volumes of vehicles which have frequently caused huge frustration, angry confrontations and additional pollution on this residential street.

Motorists on King’s Road can now only drive from west to east – the direction that takes them towards Kingston Gate – but cyclists can go in both directions as normal. New Road, which is south of King’s Road and runs parallel to it, is one-way in the other direction for motor vehicles AND cyclists. A map of the changes is on our Instagram, and you can read full details of the scheme here.

Long-time subscribers might recall that this scheme was outlined in one of our past bulletins (way back in March 2019, to be precise) but it was thwarted by some local residents before it could begin. Now it is finally up and running, you can have your say – so email tmo@kingston.gov.uk, quoting reference MapKing0090 Park Road, King’s Road and New Road, if you feel that the Healthy Streets initiative is a benefit to your safety and experience of King’s Road or New Road. We have already written to the council expressing the generally positive reaction to our social media posts on the proposal, but responses from individual people, in their own words, will carry more weight. The trial will last up to 18 months, although the council’s Kingston and North Kingston Committee could modify or make it permanent within this period based on feedback and data.

Our congratulations to The Friends Of Kingston Gate for their persistence in pursuing this goal for more than five years. If you would like to support their efforts or keep track of further developments, please follow them on Twitter.

STICKY MOMENT

One of our subscribers contacted us to help put her in touch with the park’s police following a distressing incident which left her with injuries to her shoulder and wrist while cycling from Roehampton Gate towards Robin Hood Gate last week. 

She says that a motorist was exceeding the 20mph speed limit when he made contact with her while attempting a close pass. Her jacket and the car somehow stuck together and she was dragged while cycling for about 50 metres. She and another cyclist who witnessed the incident pursued the man to a car park, but he appeared to be unaware of what had happened and, our subscriber says, “wasn’t even remotely sorry about the injury they had caused”.

Understandably, the cyclist wanted to get away as quickly as possible as she was injured and had to get home. But it is worth pointing out that if you find yourself in a similar situation, you do not need to hang around the park looking for the police. If it is an emergency, call 999; if not, dial 101. You can also file a report quickly and easily through the Met Police’s online portal (which we also include in the bio attached to our Instagram, Twitter and Facebook pages – see links to our social media at the foot of this email).

We hope that Sgt Pete Sturgess and his team are able to take action against this driver.

HEARING AID

Our thanks to Sgt Sturgess for writing to the Crown Prosecution Service in an attempt to expedite a court hearing relating to an incident involving a motorist and a cyclist which, incredibly, has been delayed for five years. The CPS provided a very long explanation, which the head of the park’s police unit didn’t divulge, and the driver is now pencilled in to appear at Kingston Crown Court in May.

Sgt Pete writes: “The incident took place on the 13th May 2019 on Queen’s Road, near the junction with Thatched House Lodge. It is believed the driver knocked the cyclist off on purpose following a road rage incident. He was charged with dangerous driving, ABH and failing to give their name and address after an accident.”

Court officials can still decide to postpone the hearing on the day. Whatever the outcome, though, we will keep you updated.

INCIDENTS AND ACCIDENTS

Time now for our quarterly look at the incidents in the park that the police attended over the past three months, as detailed in their report to the Safer Parks Police Panel. As ever, we are grateful to Sgt Sturgess and his team for collating the figures and helping to keep the roadway safer for cycling. As usual, while cycling accidents outnumber motor vehicle and pedestrian accidents, they are largely self-inflicted, and motor vehicle offences far outnumber everything else.

We are still gathering data on reported cycling accidents in Richmond Park per estimated number of miles ridden, compared with those outside. The London Cycling Campaign has produced a helpful report on dangerous road junctions across all London boroughs, and we hope to tap into the LCC’s resources for our research. 

• In October, a cyclist who braked too hard on Queen’s Road went over their handlebars and lost four teeth and cut their lip. On the same day, a child cycling down Sawyer’s Hill went to change gear, wobbled and fell, splitting their lip and losing a tooth.  A week later, a motorist misjudged entry to Roehampton Gate and collided with the iron gate causing damage to their vehicle, but no injuries.

• In November, a cyclist indicated to turn right at Ham Cross and upon starting their manoeuvre was hit from behind by a driver who was either overtaking or driving straight ahead. The cyclist was cut on their left hand and experienced pain in their right hand, on the right side of their body which was hit by the car, and on their left hip and side from hitting the road. The driver didn’t stop, and no registration was taken, so there will be no prosecution. A day later at Beverley Brook Bridge, a dog off a lead collided with a cyclist, causing them to break their hip and arm after hitting the road. The owner is likely to face a civil court action. And at Ham Gate, a motorist scraped their car, causing damage to both their vehicle and the gate’s paintwork, after one of their tyres burst.

• There were no reported road traffic collisions in December.

• As for offences, four motorists were reported for dangerous driving or driving in a manner to endanger others or themselves, as was one cyclist, and one motorist was reported for driving without due care. A total of 42 motorists were reported for speeding and 136 trade vehicle drivers were reported. Two motorists were found to not have a valid license, one had no MOT and three held no insurance. There were also 92 tickets issued for unauthorised parking or leaving a vehicle unattended and 20 for contravening signs, including no entry, on the roads closed to traffic.

• There were no cyclists reported for riding off-track this quarter but 43 motorists were reported for driving “not on a road”.

• Finally, as highlighted in earlier dispatches, a cyclist verbally abused an authorised motorist on the road closed to through traffic. This kind of mistaken intervention has largely disappeared, so thank you for spreading the word.

The police no longer provide data on the number of verbal warnings they give due to changing the system for collecting data.

Police priorities for the next quarter, as agreed by the Panel, include pedestrian safety, especially on the courtesy crossings and on the shared-use middle road. Please slow down and stop to give way if it is safe to do so. Another priority is focussing on road users contravening the priority flow system on the Beverley Brook Bridge, which applies to cyclists as well as motorists. RPC has submitted a proposal to introduce a slip lane for cyclists travelling towards Roehampton and we wait to hear from The Royal Parks, but in the meantime please wait until there is a safe gap to proceed, or switch to the adjacent shared use path. 

SEE YOU NEXT MONTH...

As ever, thank you for allowing us to pop into your inbox, and let us know what you think about anything related to cycling in Richmond Park – we reply personally to every email you send us. If you enjoyed this bulletin, please share it with your cycling friends – and if they like what they read, encourage them to sign up to our mailing list too. The more subscribers we have, the bigger our voice.

All the best,

Richmond Park Cyclists

RPC Bulletin #72, January 2024

Each month, we email a bulletin to everyone who has signed up on this site. Below is the edition that we sent in January 2024. If you like it, please sign up on our Get Involved section – you will be showing your support for our work and you will receive our free monthly bulletins a month before they appear here.

Hello, new subscriber! Your request to subscribe arrived shortly after the bulletin was sent out. So here it is, a few days late, personally mailed to you. Enjoy!

Visit our sponsors: Bella Velo, Cycle Exchange, Kingston Wheelers, London Dynamo, Look Mum No Hands!, Pearson Cycles, Richmond Cycles, Evolve e-Bikes

PLENTY MORE IN ’24

Happy New Year! We’ve taken the liberty of a break over the festive period, which means this is a much shorter newsletter than usual. Normal service will resume next month, when we will continue to pursue our goal of removing through traffic and other measures which would make the park an even better place to ride your bike. For a reminder of our vision, see this page on our website.

We believe people working within The Royal Parks and stakeholders share our goals - and the more subscribers we have, the greater chance we have of achieving our aims. So if you know of others who might be interested in our work, ask them to sign up here.

And if Santa has brought you a new bicycle, or if you want to do your existing one a favour, then get yourself down to Sheen Cross roundabout this Saturday between 11am and 2pm, where the park’s police will be running another of their popular bike marking events. Another one is scheduled on Saturday, January 27 from 11am to 2pm, which will probably be at Roehampton Gate (check our social media closer to the event for confirmation of the location). Remember: getting your bike on the national database is a disincentive for thieves, and greatly increases the chance of your pride and joy being returned to you in the event of it being recovered following its theft.

Thanks for continuing to subscribe to these bulletins, and thank you to TRP and the park’s police for maintaining our ongoing dialogue. We couldn’t do anything without help from you all!

All the best,

Richmond Park Cyclists